[dojo-contributors] new doc parser and tags

Tom Trenka ttrenka at gmail.com
Thu Jun 7 22:03:32 EDT 2012

Never got implemented but I know that when the idea of "tags" was kind of
released outside of what you were looking for, there was a lot of "oh,
tags...that's awesome.  Can we mark objects based on general categories
(like Ajax or DOM) with this?  Can we use it to bring some kind of easy
organization, so that people looking for specific functionality can find it
quickly?"...that kind of thing.  It was an idea that had some traction but
not enough for anyone to try to actually tag things that way in the API

But I can see that happening if "tags" actually worked...

-- Tom

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Bill Keese <bill at dojotoolkit.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Tom Trenka <ttrenka at gmail.com> wrote:
>> However, the usage of tags seems to have generated a bit of confusion;
>> some see it as a way of marking fields using compiled language modifiers
>> (i.e. static, protected, const), and some see it as a way of implementing a
>> tag cloud (for instance, tagging something as "ajax" or "DOM").  We'll
>> probably need to have this clarified.
>> Hmm, where are things tagged as "ajax" or "DOM"?    The style guide (
> http://livedocs.dojotoolkit.org/util/doctools/markup#tags plus
> http://livedocs.dojotoolkit.org/util/doctools/markup#method-specific-tags)
> lists the set of expected tags (although now looking at it, I see that
> dijit has also been using const and readonly, so I need to add those).
> _______________________________________________
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at mail.dojotoolkit.org
> http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20120607/92fc9960/attachment.htm 

More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list