[dojo-contributors] Dojo 1.7 Goals: has() and granular dependency lists
kzyp at dojotoolkit.org
Tue Mar 15 09:14:44 EDT 2011
On 3/14/2011 11:30 PM, Bill Keese wrote:
> Rawld - thanks for working on this, let's definitely talk about it in
> the weekly meeting (Wednesday for you).
> I don't think there's anything to debate besides the has() stuff,
> which we definitely haven't come to any conclusion on yet (see
> despite Kris trying to push ahead with his preference.
It is trivial to switch to a different style of constructing/pulling in
the has function, making a commit doesn't set it in stone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dojo-contributors