[dojo-contributors] Dojo 1.7 Goals: has() and granular dependency lists

Kris Zyp kzyp at dojotoolkit.org
Tue Mar 15 09:14:44 EDT 2011

On 3/14/2011 11:30 PM, Bill Keese wrote:
> Rawld - thanks for working on this, let's definitely talk about it in
> the weekly meeting (Wednesday for you).
> I don't think there's anything to debate besides the has() stuff,
> which we definitely haven't come to any conclusion on yet (see
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dojo.devel/13600/focus=13788),
> despite Kris trying to push ahead with his preference.

It is trivial to switch to a different style of constructing/pulling in
the has function, making a commit doesn't set it in stone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20110315/68cfa5b8/attachment.htm 

More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list