[dojo-contributors] Dojo 1.7 Goals: has() and granular dependency lists
kzyp at dojotoolkit.org
Tue Mar 15 09:13:08 EDT 2011
On 3/14/2011 10:24 PM, Bill Keese wrote:
> Doesn't your patch break backwards-compatibility? Note the comment
> in all the methods in the current code:
> with one difference: when
> //run over sparse arrays, the Dojo function invokes the callback for
> //1.6's indexOf skips the holes in the sparse array.
I didn't write any new code, I just switched from the old build pragma
to has() branching. If it is not backwards-compatible, it hasn't been
backwards-compatible for sometime... So it is backwards-compatible with
the old backwards-incompatibility ;).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dojo-contributors