[dojo-contributors] Dojo 1.7 Goals: has() and granular dependency lists
bill at dojotoolkit.org
Sun Mar 13 08:00:51 EDT 2011
2011/3/12 Kris Zyp <kzyp at dojotoolkit.org>
> There are a couple of additional overarching goals that I would like to
> see pursued in 1.7. First, we should start using the has() pattern for
> feature detection branching in our code. Here is the ticket for (and
> explaining) this enhancement:
Sounds good, events.js might be a good place to start as that has a lot of
browser specific code. I just hope you don't bloat the code base too much
for users that aren't doing browser-specific builds (ie: all of our current
users). There's also an execution-speed concern, especially since your
version of the has() tests don't cache the results.
The related thing question is, how would a user do a browser specific build?
AFAIK there's no tool to extract out the has() tests scattered across each
source code file, run them all, and then save the results for each browser.
> Second, as our AMD support will be improved in 1.7, we should start using
> more precise dependency lists to facilitate highly optimized builds (only
> what is needed) and fewer runtime property lookups:
> I don't think the entirety of the Dojo codebase necessarily needs to be
> upgraded to these two coding improvements, but we should try to perform
> these upgrades when possible on code that is actively maintained or
> developed, or heavily used modules.
Precise dependencies is on the dijit list too, although it's hard to tell
what a file's dependencies are since everything in dojo/_base maps to the
same "dojo" namespace.
If anyone has a tool to "fix" the dependency list for our files that would
> Also, if anyone is interested here is patch for adding a module for
> supporting native JSON parsing (using the techniques listed above):
I looked at the patch briefly, but it's confusing/scary. You doubled the
size of dojo/_base/json.js and added a new file dojo/json.js which is also
pretty big, although mostly comments. What's going on there?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dojo-contributors