[dojo-contributors] Dojo Utilities?
kzyp at dojotoolkit.org
Thu Mar 10 15:30:54 EST 2011
On 3/10/2011 9:42 AM, Adam L. Peller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Kris Zyp <kzyp at dojotoolkit.org
> <mailto:kzyp at dojotoolkit.org>> wrote:
> On 3/10/2011 8:29 AM, Chris Mitchell wrote:
> > I hear there is a Dojo Foundation account that can be used...
> > are the details for how we can establish GitHub projects maintained
> > under this account.
> This is possible to, but this seems counterproductive in terms of
> granularity of control and ownership which is part of the reason for
> breaking DojoX up. I think it would be better to have smaller units of
> organization that can be more specifically controlled.
> Except where code is under CLA, it would be preferable, I think, to
> have access control which assures the origins conform to the
> contributor list. Perhaps github could help us track or even automate
> this. For some projects, we may wish to restrict access further,
> others would be free to develop even without CLA if they choose. I
> think we were talking about having a bit in the project metadata to
> indicate CLA status, which might be further limited by a subset which
> indicates Dojo "ownership" for maintenance.
Yes, we should maintain a list of CLA-acceptable github accounts and
then projects from those accounts could designate whether or not they
are CLA conformant (for the Dojo foundation). I would assume a ibm-dojo
account could be on that list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dojo-contributors