[dojo-contributors] Dojo Utilities?

Kris Zyp kzyp at dojotoolkit.org
Thu Mar 10 15:30:54 EST 2011


On 3/10/2011 9:42 AM, Adam L. Peller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Kris Zyp <kzyp at dojotoolkit.org
> <mailto:kzyp at dojotoolkit.org>> wrote:
>
>     On 3/10/2011 8:29 AM, Chris Mitchell wrote: 
>
>     >   I hear there is a Dojo Foundation account that can be used...
>     Where
>     > are the details for how we can establish GitHub projects maintained
>     > under this account.
>     >
>     This is possible to, but this seems counterproductive in terms of
>     granularity of control and ownership which is part of the reason for
>     breaking DojoX up. I think it would be better to have smaller units of
>     organization that can be more specifically controlled.
>
>
> Except where code is under CLA, it would be preferable, I think, to
> have access control which assures the origins conform to the
> contributor list.  Perhaps github could help us track or even automate
> this.  For some projects, we may wish to restrict access further,
> others would be free to develop even without CLA if they choose.  I
> think we were talking about having a bit in the project metadata to
> indicate CLA status, which might be further limited by a subset which
> indicates Dojo "ownership" for maintenance.

Yes, we should maintain a list of CLA-acceptable github accounts and
then projects from those accounts could designate whether or not they
are CLA conformant (for the Dojo foundation). I would assume a ibm-dojo
account could be on that list.
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20110310/666fc4aa/attachment.htm 


More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list