[dojo-contributors] dojo.Stateful - long live r23032!

Rahul Akolkar rahul.akolkar at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 09:31:47 EST 2011

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Bill Keese <bill at dojotoolkit.org> wrote:
> We didn't agree to this at the meeting (or at any other time).

Correct, its MO -- tautologically, I disagree with anyone who
disagrees with me on something as fundamental as this :-)

The current (and also original, which is worth a lot) dojo.Stateful
behavior is superior. Reasons are in #12399, IRC log from yesterday's
meeting and below. This is also the behavior in v1.5 and v1.6.

I don't see how any of this can be discounted. As an avid Dojo user, I
therefore strongly object to changing related dojo.Stateful behavior
beyond r23032. Which brings us to the subject of this email.


> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Kris,
>> Just got a chance to look at said rev, so to clarify -- lets keep
>> Stateful behavior the way it is ATM.
>> Rationale is simple: application can trivially ignore equal values now
>> if it so chooses, whereas there is no way for application to override
>> r{22883-23032} behavior.
>> Cheers,
>> -Rahul

More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list