[dojo-contributors] DDD 2010 - Pulsar
bill at dojotoolkit.org
Mon Oct 18 09:11:52 EDT 2010
Thanks Eugene! A few thoughts/questions that we can talk about on
1) What does the concept of "base" mean in the brave new world of
requireJS? Is there still something akin to the dojo namespace (albeit
not really a global variable)? I do see the main-browser.js file
which combines a few modules. Or, are you talking about treating base
like a package, same as Tom's proposal for dojox packages, and then
putting the other core files like dojo.fx into separate packages?
2) When you said "influenced by EmbedJS" I figured you meant having
alternate files based on browser capability (ex: query.js for browsers
that support querySelectorAll() [well] and a larger query-ie.js for
IE6-8), but I don't see that. Not sure what the influence is.
3) I wonder if we should branch from 1.x so that GIT can help us merge
1.x fixes into 2.0, or if we should just do it by hand. Core isn't
changing much nowadays except for dojo.store.
4) hard to tell what you changed exactly, besides removing deprecated
functions and switching to requireJS format.
5) plugd.connectlive() and dojox.NodeList.delegate() are similar
6) dijit's plan is depending on that trigger code, so hopefully we will
add it into base
On 10/17/10 11:07 PM, Eugene Lazutkin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> As promised I started to prototype the upcoming Dojo 2.0 Base AKA
> "Pulsar". You can find it there: http://github.com/uhop/pulsar
> (warning: work in progress, extremely far from finished).
> While not everything is in place, you can look at what's available to
> get a feel. As of now it is a straight port of existing Dojo Base
> modules, no controversial decisions were made at this point. ;-) It is
> based on RequireJS --- newly accepted Dojo Foundation project
> (congrats!). EmbedJS by Uxebu was a big input. Some DojoX and plugd
> modules are considered as candidates for some functionality.
> At this point and in the near future Pulsar is not positioned as a
> final product. It is more of a playground to try out different ideas.
> Nothing is set in stone. Any code in it will be benchmarked for
> performance and size impact. Ideally we can grow it to be the base,
> but be prepared that it can be discarded and we will start anew.
> I plan to have an informal presentation/town hall/round table-type
> discussion during DDD, so we can talk about philosophy of the change
> - --- goals, possible solutions, alternatives, and other pertinent
> details. I need all input and all help I can get --- please come
> prepared by thinking about this problem, what should be changed in
> Dojo, what should be added, and what should be preserved. Any
> practical/constructive ideas are welcomed. Non-technical ideas (visual
> design, marketing, PR) are welcomed too. Feedback from your projects,
> which can suggest or confirm changes, would be invaluable as well.
> Let's make Pulsar the community-driven project --- only together we
> can do something great.
> Special attention is paid to mobile web apps. If you are mobile
> developers, be prepared to talk about your experiences.
> Clearly the base, while important, is just a small part of Dojo 2.0.
> IMHO, the most important action would be in the loader (RequireJS at
> the moment), additional packages (the base is a mere package), the
> package manager, and the future package marketplace. Those big things
> will make or break Dojo 2.0 and we cannot afford to screw it up. If
> you have any positive ideas, real world experience, or constructive
> criticism relevant to those areas --- please share!
> See you all in at Palm!
> - --
> Eugene Lazutkin
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at mail.dojotoolkit.org
More information about the dojo-contributors