[dojo-contributors] Module formats for the browser

Tom Trenka ttrenka at gmail.com
Thu Mar 25 13:37:38 EDT 2010

I'm sorry, I was under the impression that you were advocating the use
of server-side processes to facilitate the move to CommonJS-format

-- Tom

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Kris Zyp <kzyp at dojotoolkit.org> wrote:
> On 3/25/2010 11:30 AM, Tom Trenka wrote:
>> I would agree; one of the core principles we had when Dojo was started
>> was "server-agnostic".  Granted--Java, PHP and Python have, in varying
>> degrees, been used but always with an independent process or with
>> testing, and never as a real dependency.
>> I am all for moving to RequireJS and removing the
>> dojo.require/dojo.provide needs with a module for 2.0 but requiring
>> another server-side process, similar to the build system, is (to me at
>> least) a major barrier to entry, and we should be focusing on
>> eliminating the barriers as Dojo evolves.
> I don't understand, what did I say that suggested that Dojo become
> dependent on a server-side process for Dojo users?
> Kris
> _______________________________________________
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at mail.dojotoolkit.org
> http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors

More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list