[dojo-contributors] common cometd.js for dojo & jquery

Dustin Machi dmachi at dojotoolkit.org
Sat May 9 04:06:42 EDT 2009

>> or it again
>> seems like we're penalizing Dojo because the other libs don't support
>> advanced features such as packaging and building (while Dojo was here
>> first :P).  IMO if we end up with something that is abstracted and
>> larger, and prevents normal dojo.require()/builds, someone will end  
>> up
>> re-implementing it or will use the old client...and of course that
>> probably doesn't help any of us.
> I don't think there are any compromises being asked of for the dojo
> implementation.  In fact, I think the new impl is smaller than
> the old.
I was primarily referring to the ability to use packaging and  
building, and to a lesser extent reuse of each libraries existing  
infrastructure for i/o rather than having an abstraction for this, but  
it sounds like this wont' be the case based on your other comments. :)

More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list