[dojo-contributors] Propose Promote dijit.sniff
ttrenka at gmail.com
Fri May 8 13:21:09 EDT 2009
This was actually a bit of a battle in the shift from 0.4 to 0.9. The issue
at hand is that it's invasive on a document; having CSS classes added to a
document simply because you load up Dojo is a bad thing from a marketing
perspective, because any web developer (the kind of people using MooTools
and jQuery) would like to have control over how their documents are
I'd be fine with it in the Core but I would definitely object to having it
in Base; it should be an optional thing, not something we enforce on the
community at large.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Adam Peller <peller at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm ok with it moving to core as a module that people can optionally
> use. It's often a necessary evil, but many people believe user-agent
> sniffing is a bad practice or a last resort, and it's certainly not
> future-proof, so I'd be -1 on base, regardless of code size.
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Peter E Higgins <dante at dojotoolkit.org>
> > Mike Wilcox wrote:
> >> I'd like to propose that dijit.sniff get promoted to Dojo Base.
> > we can't really afford it [the bytes] in base, but the functionality is
> > already slated for Core. I'd hoped to do it for 1.3, but slacked.
> > Moving parts of dijit.place into Dojo Core was also part of this.
> > Regards,
> > Peter
> > --
> > Peter E Higgins
> > Dojo Project Lead : http://dojotoolkit.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > dojo-contributors mailing list
> > dojo-contributors at mail.dojotoolkit.org
> > http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at mail.dojotoolkit.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dojo-contributors