[dojo-contributors] 1.3 direction

Adam L. Peller adam at peller.org
Thu Sep 25 16:56:28 EDT 2008

For general Dojo issues, IE8 and matrix testing are extremely high on my
list.  Matrix testing for the tests we've got being much higher priority
than writing automated tests, IMHO.  We can talk about when is the right
time to cover Chrome.

It seems like Bill's ideas fall into a few different buckets with very
different sizes: project wide, dojox->dijit migration, and widget-specific
features.  (I'd consider adding validation hints to the feature list as
well, if we can figure out how to do it -- e.g. mm-dd-yyyy)  Whether the
widget-specific features make it in 1.3 or 1.4 and the timing of those
releases are things we'll need to work out.  For migrating widgets from
dojox to dijit, I'm not sure I see the pressing need, unless it's just to
make dijit more marketable.  Do we feel these widgets have settled down, at
least when it comes to API stability, or perhaps it would be best to wait
another cycle to be sure?  Perhaps we should do some sort of API review like
we (sort of) did for most of Dijit in 0.9 before moving the code?


On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Dylan Schiemann <mail at dylans.org> wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> Obviously I'd like to see more polish, probably less new features, and a
> faster 1.3 release (perhaps plan for mod-November prior to the US
> holidaze season?).  Basically a pretty major reduction in the number of
> bugs seems important to me.
> IE 8 will probably need to be addressed in this time frame.
> I'd also like to have the new site implemented, demos and docs in place,
>  a web-based build system, etc.  Basically taking the time to make life
> easier for users and contributors, and then we can regroup for a bunch
> of new features in 1.4 in 2009.
> I should also have a fairly mature draft for the Dojo Foundation site
> done by the end of the Ajax Experience, thanks to help from Torrey,
> Chris Anderson (SitePen), and Tobias Klipstein (uxebu).
> Regards,
> - -Dylan
> Bill Keese wrote:
> > Can we contributors reach some consensus on the two or three top
> > priorities for the 1.3 release that we'll all work on?  What do you
> > think they should be?  (I won't be there on Sunday so I thought I'd
> > start the thread here.)
> >
> > Basically, I'm looking for consensus/buy-in from the people actually
> > writing the code, so we can work together towards that common goal.  We
> > did this once before back in the 0.9 development days, when we decided
> > to rewrite everything.  But I don't think we've really done it since
> > then.   The 1.3 delata should be a lot smaller than 0.9 delta, but
> > should still set a general direction.
> >
> > I have some ideas but I figure I'll let others answer first.   Although,
> > BTW, I started a discussion about Dijit 1.3 priorities in
> > http://dojotoolkit.org/2008/09/17/dijit-1-3.
> > _______________________________________________
> > dojo-contributors mailing list
> > dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
> > http://turtle.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
> >
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> iD8DBQFI29yT8nLgh/JJsxERAgIiAJ0XJgeHof/5eMI/SeAyAWjvsgnh0QCfWkUi
> JTV4cv+rnV9I7ARabzEOUCA=
> =y3k7
> _______________________________________________
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
> http://turtle.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20080925/d4bbf83a/attachment.htm 

More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list