[dojo-contributors] Question about licensing excanvas
ttrenka at gmail.com
Thu Sep 11 11:21:17 EDT 2008
Here's the thing--IMHO, not *everything* needs to live in the Dojo codebase,
especially when the code in question is easily linkable via externals or
something to that effect. I don't have a problem with the idea of using
excanvas, I just have a problem with the need to make a copy of it and slap
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Nathan Toone <toonetown at dojotoolkit.org>wrote:
> That's fine as well...I just wanted to make it a bit easier to include
> using dojo.require...and to provide a "stepping stone" (perhaps) for
> starting to migrate canvas-based code to using dojox.gfx.
> I'm not tied to including it in the dojo codebase...I just had thought
> that it might be useful for others...
> On Sep 11, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Tom Trenka wrote:
> > Just curious,
> > Why does this need to move into dojo as one of our extension
> > libraries? The excanvas license allows anyone to pick it up there
> > already if they want to, and we wont have to field questions about it
> > and its limitations.
> > In fact, I agree: I don't see any reason to move this into the Dojo
> > codebase at all. Why not just use svn:externals to consume it, or
> > do what we've done in the past and give instructions on how to get it?
> > regards,
> > trt
> > _______________________________________________
> > dojo-contributors mailing list
> > dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
> > http://turtle.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dojo-contributors