[dojo-contributors] 1.3 direction
alex at dojotoolkit.org
Sun Oct 5 16:29:53 EDT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hrm...so the parent/child relationship stuff has been factored out
into the container/contained mixins (which does seem appropriate). Is
the concern that the base _Widget superclass doesn't contain this
logic? Or that not all Dijit widgets are Containers?
On Oct 5, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Eugene Lazutkin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> If you'll be looking into widget guts --- I got complains from some
> users that not all widgets support parent-child relationships, while
> is quite possible and reasonable to do so.
> Alex Russell wrote:
> | Fair enough. I'm more interested in getting some abstractions
> | up (there's some stuff missing in Dijit for things like sets of
> | widgets and mixins for data-driven widgets, etc.) and making the
> | package systems better address the challenges people have in setting
> | up a sophisticated Dojo environment (which nearly everyone has by
> | time they have a large-scale app).
> | DTL is awesome. It makes the lives of template devs a lot simpler.
> | like to see it become the default template system SRTL, but I'm not
> | wedded to it for 1.3.
> | Regards
> | On Oct 5, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Adam L. Peller wrote:
> |> Pete beat me to it, but I'll reiterate - dojox project state should
> |> reflect
> |> maturity *before* we migrate. Also, stating the obvious, there
> |> be
> |> commitment from someone to maintain the code if it is moved into
> |> dojo/dijit. DTL is very cool, but I'm not sure I see the rush to
> |> get it in
> |> Dijit.
alex at sitepen.com A99F 8785 F491 D5FD 04D7 ACD9 4158 FFDF 2894 6876
alex at dojotoolkit.org BE03 E88D EABB 2116 CC49 8259 CF78 E242 59C3 9723
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dojo-contributors