[dojo-contributors] what we left behind...

Tom Trenka ttrenka at gmail.com
Fri May 9 17:34:56 EDT 2008


I'm confused.  I thought the CLA requirement was for anything
distributed as part of the Dojo Toolkit, not for anything that lives
on our servers.

Has something changed or have things been badly interpreted?

--trt

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Alex Russell <alex at dojotoolkit.org> wrote:
> CLA is very much required or else it can't live on our servers.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Alex Russell
> alex at dojotoolkit.org
> alex at sitepen.com
>
> On May 9, 2008, at 8:20 AM, "Shane O'Sullivan" <shaneosullivan1 at gmail.com
>  > wrote:
>
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> dojoc is the repository for DojoCampus (or Dojo Community... whichever
>> you like..).  Check out dojocampus.org
>>
>> It is designed to have a lower bar of entry for the community, so
>> people can send in cool demos, tips'n'tricks etc that they would like
>> to share with the community at large, without having to sign a CLA.
>>
>> You can check it out at http://svn.dojotoolkit.org/dojoc
>>
>> Shane
>>
>> 2008/5/9 Jon Sykes <lists at jpsykes.com>:
>>> Bill, what is this dojoc you speak of, I've never heard of that
>>> before.  Is there any additional info?
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 8, 2008, at 9:33 PM, Bill Keese wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I  e-mailed him about a month ago (vkrantz at snapps.com
>>>>> <mailto:vkrantz at snapps.com>) asking about the license (if any) and
>>>>> spinning it into a dojox project.
>>>>
>>>> I thought this was what dojoc/ repository is for?  Less restrictions
>>>> on
>>>> licensing and quality, for lack of a better term.  Right phiggins?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Also, we should link to excellent articles like this, even if
>>>>> they're
>>>>> 0.4... but much better if they're 1.0 :)  These are exactly the
>>>>> sorts of
>>>>> things I'd like to see us incorporate as dojox widget mixins, so it
>>>>> would be better still if some of it got donated back when he's
>>>>> done, but
>>>>> that's not a requirement. Some of it may be better off as a 3rd-
>>>>> party demo.
>>>>
>>>> Definitely, phiggins/dmachi can you comment on this?
>>>>
>>>> We that a bit in the old days, see for example
>>>> http://dojo.jot.com/Tutorials, but not sure if we have a place for
>>>> such
>>>> links now?
>>>>
>>>> I think there are a bunch of articles on sitepen.com that we should
>>>> link
>>>> to too, right?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dojo-contributors mailing list
>>>> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
>>>> http://turtle.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dojo-contributors mailing list
>>> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
>>> http://turtle.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dojo-contributors mailing list
>> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
>> http://turtle.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
> _______________________________________________
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
> http://turtle.dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
>



More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list