[dojo-contributors] Splitting projects between dojo and dojox

Tom Trenka ttrenka at gmail.com
Fri Jun 1 09:55:05 EDT 2007

If the code lives in DojoX, it should at least be named with it...I
understand what you're saying but the reality is that we should never assume
that just because the idea behind something is to incubate it, it doesn't
meant that it will gain automatic acceptance.  Besides, it's a lot easier to
change "dojox" to "dojo" =).



On 6/1/07, Ben Lowery <blowery at dojotoolkit.org> wrote:
> > Alex and I (and I think Bill, though I really haven't discussed
> > this with him) see one of DojoX's functions as a place to develop
> > something outside of Dojo and Dijit, with an aim to moving it to
> > either eventually.  All I'd say is make sure Alex is on board with
> > your ideas and basic game plan, and then split according to your
> > judgement.
> If one of the goals is to incubate code in dojox for a while and then
> move it to dojo core later on when it's baked, should we consider
> hanging that code off the dojo object instead of the dojox object?
> That way when the move happens, all the consumer would have to change
> are the requires instead of having to dig through all of their code
> looking for dojox.{func1, func2, ..., funcN}
> --b
> _______________________________________________
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20070601/89da76cc/attachment.htm 

More information about the dojo-contributors mailing list