[dojo-contributors] Improved mixin semantics
Scott J. Miles
sjmiles at turboajax.com
Thu Aug 9 16:23:52 EDT 2007
Ok, I wasn't being clear sorry.
So, I've already fixed every instance of dojo.declare I could find in
Before I commit, I'm trying to run as many tests and examples as
possible to make sure I didn't have any typos.
After I do this commit, I strong suggest everybody update before they
edit their stuff or they will have collisions.
I will post a message to this effect again in a few minutes.
Scott J. Miles
peter e higgins wrote:
> On Thursday 09 August 2007 15:14, Scott J. Miles wrote:
>> Yes, I would never ship anything (on purpose) that outputs warnings, so
>> I'm not suggesting we let it go.
> i misinterpreted your statements then ... seemed like you were saying "tough
> luck, i'll fix the dijit/dojox warnings if i can find some time, they aren't
> that important anyway" ... seemingly ignoring the fact the dijit folks have
> until tomorrow to stop fixing bugs and start writing docs and testing more
> for the next round.
> but I agree its good you got this in _before_ 0.9 goes out. such a shift in
> API _again_ would horrify people. :)
>> >> i think we [you?] should solidfy this, then go out the
>> >> door with 0.9 "as is" ...
>> I don't know what that means.
> I guess I should have said 'rectify' ...
> and "as is" meaning "look ma, no deprecation warnings from the get-go" ...
> Peter Higgins
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
More information about the dojo-contributors