owen at smartsoul.com
Thu Dec 7 17:49:51 EST 2006
Sorry if I was unclear, I'm for using forums. Read my reference to
"blocker" below as "a feature that I really, really, really think we
should have in whichever forums package we decide to go with (which I
hope we decide on soon)".
We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -- Mohandas K.
On Dec 7, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Jon Sykes wrote:
> But that's exactly my point.
> I can't handle the volume of dojo interests, because it covers
> everything in terms of support.
> If that was broken down into groupings I'd probably pick 2 or 3
> that I felt comfortable about being of add-value and I'd focus on
> helping there. This division of labor, and having certain groups of
> people specialize in responding to certain questions will not only
> improve the quality of responses and the knowledge held in each
> area, it will also give a wider group of people ownership for
> responding to certain types of questions.
> Jon Sykes
> On Dec 7, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Owen Williams wrote:
>> I think the voting is almost a blocker for me, as there is too
>> much traffic (on -dev and -interest) for me to keep up with now.
>> Adding more streams of data will make this problem worse -- we
>> need some way to help people keep up with what's important. The
>> "mail roundtrip" option I suggested below seems less important to me.
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dojo-contributors