[dojo-contributors] forums

[Owen Williams]

Sorry if I was unclear, I'm for using forums.  Read my reference to  
"blocker" below as "a feature that I really, really, really think we  
should have in whichever forums package we decide to go with (which I  
hope we decide on soon)".

thanks
O

-------------------------
We must be the change we wish to see in the world.   -- Mohandas K.  
Gandhi


On Dec 7, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Jon Sykes wrote:

> But that's exactly my point.
>
> I can't handle the volume of dojo interests, because it covers  
> everything in terms of support.
>
> If that was broken down into groupings I'd probably pick 2 or 3  
> that I felt comfortable about being of add-value and I'd focus on  
> helping there. This division of labor, and having certain groups of  
> people specialize in responding to certain questions will not only  
> improve the quality of responses and the knowledge held in each  
> area, it will also give a wider group of people ownership for  
> responding to certain types of questions.
>
>
> Jon Sykes
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Owen Williams wrote:
>
>> I think the voting is almost a blocker for me, as there is too  
>> much traffic (on -dev and -interest) for me to keep up with now.   
>> Adding more streams of data will make this problem worse -- we  
>> need some way to help people keep up with what's important.   The  
>> "mail roundtrip" option I suggested below seems less important to me.
>>
>> cheers
>> O
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors at dojotoolkit.org
> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-contributors/attachments/20061207/8e58c142/attachment.htm