[Dojo-checkins] [dojo] #5532: Source tags not propertly identified in jsdoc
dojo
trac at dojotoolkit.org
Tue Sep 9 14:19:51 UTC 2008
#5532: Source tags not propertly identified in jsdoc
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dante | Owner: pottedmeat
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: 1.2
Component: General | Version: 1.0
Severity: major | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: jsdoc source |
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by dante):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Old description:
> refs #5531 , the link on that page points to the dojo.attr() api info.
>
> the source block listed shows part of the comments intended for
> description.
>
> (also, #5531 illustrates exactly why we so desperately need versioning
> working in jsdoc)
>
> even if it's just a way to use a set of data, like
> ?q=jsdoc/blahblah/v=11000
> and even better, because we were talking about regexp and htaccess and
> rewrite rules:
>
> dojotoolkit.org/api/1.0/dojo.attr - "not found"
> dojotoolkit.org/api/trunk/dojo.attr - "has data"
New description:
refs #5531 , the link on that page points to the dojo.attr() api info.
the source block listed shows part of the comments intended for
description.
(also, #5531 illustrates exactly why we so desperately need versioning
working in jsdoc)
even if it's just a way to use a set of data, like
?q=jsdoc/blahblah/v=11000
and even better, because we were talking about regexp and htaccess and
rewrite rules:
dojotoolkit.org/api/1.0/dojo.attr - "not found"
dojotoolkit.org/api/trunk/dojo.attr - "has data"
--
Comment:
versioning and hot-linking are available no in api-staging.dtk ... seems
to be working as expected.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.dojotoolkit.org/ticket/5532#comment:3>
dojo <http://dojotoolkit.org/>
The Dojo UI Toolkit
More information about the Dojo-checkins
mailing list